Re: Public Assertions

* Jeff Shultz · * Tue Nov 25 15:23:29 2008

Can anyone explain why we are being exposed to this? From either side?
[email protected] wrote:

On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 08:56:43AM -0800, Bill Woodcock wrote:

 On Tue, 25 Nov 2008 [email protected] wrote:

> If I may... I am in possesion of your certified letter
> -AND- the signed acknowledgement that you received notice

> that I have taken posession of said certified mail.

>
> please get your facts straight, esp. when making formal
> replies to government inqueries. it can only strengthen

> your case if you tell the truth.
Equally but differently untruthful in my case. Myself, I don't sit around
my house all day, breathlessly anticipating a new missive from Dean.
 -Bill

	then what, pray tell, do you do to while away the hours?
	knit? route IP datagrams? carve elaborate totems from ancient redwoods?
	myself, I have taken up Portugese... such an expressive language.
 my instruction in the email above was derived from reading the submitted
comments to the DoC/NOI on securing the DNS. telling us lies is one thing,

factual mis-statements to the goverment is something else and i
fail to see how doing so helps ones cause.
	in the event that anyone has doubts, I will be glad to scan and post
	the evidence.  Dean, care to amend your statements?

--bill

--
Jeff Shultz