North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: NAT66 and the subscriber prefix length

  • From: Mikael Abrahamsson
  • Date: Fri Nov 14 14:28:54 2008

On Fri, 14 Nov 2008, [email protected] wrote:

Not long ago, ARIN changed the IPv6 policy so that
residential subscribers could be issued with a /56
instead of the normal /48 assignment. This was done
so that ISPs with large numbers of subscriber sites
would not exhaust their /32 (or larger) allocations
too soon. Since these ISPs are allowed to assign
a /56 to residential subscriber sites, their initial
IPv6 allocation will last a lot longer and they won't
have to apply for an additional allocation while
everyone is getting up to speed with an IPv6 Internet.

We returned our /32 for a /25 (with /22 being reserved) and current plan is to hand out /48s to everybody (unless they need even more space, then they'll have to apply).


So, doing /56 to end users just because you happen to have a /32 right now sounds like a bad plan, it doesn't take that many hours to get a larger space if you can justify it (which wasn't that hard for us).

We received our /32 (as a /35 I think) back in 2000 or so, policy has changed since then, with RIPE it's not that hard to get a much larger space with a long term growth plan. My hope is that we'll make do with this /22 space for at least 5-10 years (67 million customer /48s is quite a lot), unless something really big happens, and then we'll just have to get an even larger space.

So message should be that /48 to end users is the way to go, and this should suit residential and SME market without any additional administrative overhead depending on customer size.

--
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: [email protected]