Re: Potential Prefix Hijack

• From: Raymond Dijkxhoorn
• Date: Tue Nov 11 07:38:57 2008

• List-archive: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog>
• List-help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=help>
• List-id: North American Network Operators Group <nanog.nanog.org>
• List-post: <mailto:[email protected]>
• List-subscribe: <http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=subscribe>
• List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>

We were hijacked aswell, by 27664 16735

Our affected prefixes were:

94.46.0.0/16
194.88.142.0/23
194.11.23.0/24
82.102.0.0/18
195.246.238.0/23
194.107.127.0/24
81.92.192.0/19
193.227.238.0/23

We are trying to contact them in order to get some feedback, and some good explanation for this.

Bye,
Raymond.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Potential Prefix Hijack Nuno Vieira - nfsi telecom
  • Re: Potential Prefix Hijack Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET
  • Re: Potential Prefix Hijack Patrick W. Gilmore

• References:
  • Re: Potential Prefix Hijack Nuno Vieira - nfsi telecom

• Prev by Date: Re: Potential Prefix Hijack
• Next by Date: Re: Potential Prefix Hijack
• Date Index
• Thread Index
• Author Index
• Historical