|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: Peering - Benefits?
In article <[email protected]>, Andy Davidson <[email protected]> wrote: >On 30 Oct 2008, at 13:03, HRH Sven Olaf Prinz von CyberBunker-Kamphuis >MP wrote: >> (the amsix with their many outages and connected parties that rely >> primarliy on it's functionality is a prime example here) > >I run interconnection for three networks connected to the ams-ix and >can't understand why you think that the ams-ix fabric has "many >outages" - I have found it, to borrow a phrase from another stable >European IXP, rock solid. The AMS-IX is a service that is present at multiple colocation providers. One or two of these are, let's say, not state of the art anymore. But that's a colo issue and doesn't have anything to do with the AMS-IX network. This is different from the US, where an internet exchange is usually tied in with one colocation provider, so I can see where the confusion comes from. Mike.
|