North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical
Re: Another driver for v6?
* David W. Hankins > It is almost lunacy to deploy IPv6 in a customer-facing sense (note > for example Google's choice to put its AAAA on a separate FQDN). At > this point, I'd say people are still trying to figure out how clients > will migrate to IPv6. Which seems like a pretty bad time to still be > trying to figure that out, but ohwell. Google has been testing this a bit on their main pages. Select quotes from the presentation of their results: > 0.238% of users have useful IPv6 connectivity (and prefer IPv6) > 0.09% of users have broken IPv6 connectivity The summary disagrees with you about the Âalmost lunacyÂ part: > It's not that broken > - ~0.09% clients lost, ~150ms extra latency - don't believe the FUD The slides are here, they're worth a look in my opinion: http://rosie.ripe.net/ripe/meetings/ripe-57/presentations/uploads/Thursday/Plenary 14:00/upl/Colitti-Global_IPv6_statistics_-_Measuring_the_current_state_of_IPv6_for_ordinary_users.xD5A.pdf Best regards, -- Tore Anderson