North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical
Re: The DDOS problem & security BOF: Am i mistaken?
Since you so many facts wrong, a response is necessary. On Wed, 15 Oct 2008, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote: > I actually was thinking of the ARIN list that you had the temporary > ban on : > > http://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-discuss/2008-February/000897.html I don't have a page on this because it is currently the subject of litigation. However, since you brought it up, I have to defend myself. As my attorney pointed out to ARIN, this ban was based on a fabrication by ARIN. Among other things, ARIN also threatened to make false claims that I sent spam to the ARIN lists. ARIN has also published the communications between my lawyer and ARIN's lawyer, which is very irregular. This particular ban disrupted and ended a discussion about the lack of quorum in elections that brought Bradner, Curran, Howard, Manning, Vixie and Woodcock to the ARIN Board of Directors. Notices were recently sent (certified mail) to all six ARIN Board Members informing them of the lack of quorum in their election and that they are not authorized to act as Board Members. The ban has prevented other voting members from learning these facts. (Manning and Woodcock have so far refused to accept the certified letters) In the meantime, the Board (Vixie et al) have tried to alter the ARIN bylaws to change the quorum requirements. But because the Board members voting on these changes weren't validly elected, their modifications are also invalid. Board members (e.g. Ray Plzak) also have a duty to object to improper acts; such as allowing invalidly elected board members to act as board members. This might be a tad legal, but NANOG has had seminars on internet law, so some basic business law is just a part of any operator's skillset. Everyone should know that membership rights to democratic participation are intangible property, and should know that taking property (including membership rights to democratic participation) on false pretenses is fraud. Threatening to take such property by force or fear is extortion. I encourage everyone to read http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/eousa/foia_reading_room/usam/title9/crm02403.htm particularly United States v. Teamsters Local 560. > and then the permanent ban : > > http://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-discuss/2008-June/001058.html Also based on fabrication, by a non-neutral body of Vixie/NANOG cronies. My attorney is preparing a response to this, so I can't comment very much about it. > as for banning from NANOG, there is a message, purportedly from > you : > > http://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-discuss/2008-February/000890.html > > contains "So Harris banned me from NANOG." . Not sure if thats the > meeting, the NANOG list, or one of the NANOG/Merit other lists. The list, I don't know if this applies to meetings. However, Jeremy Porter threatened 'Dead Anderson' with "Maybe with any luck he'll show up at the next nanog meeting and be suprised in a dark alley." So I haven't attended any meetings where there will be NANOG people present without much security. It is interesing to note however that the NANOG-affiliated ARIN AUP committee claimed in June 2008 that this threat wasn't made. > Also, in : http://www.iadl.org/nanog/nanog-story.html > > I see "So, effective May 4 2005, Harris again banned Anderson. > Although the new "reformed" rules require a limit of 6 months, > Anderson remains banned as of April 16th, 2006. It seems permanent." This refers to the NANOG reform movement in 2005. If that's really not clear from the page, I'll edit the page for clarity. > but I think that refers to another NANOG group, dnsop. DNSOP isn't a NANOG group. Its an IETF group. http://www.av8.net/IETF-watch/IESG/IESG-PR-discussion.html In fact, you might find everything on http://www.av8.net/IETF-watch interesting. Hope that clears up the facts. --Dean -- Av8 Internet Prepared to pay a premium for better service? www.av8.net faster, more reliable, better service 617 344 9000