North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: rackmount managed PDUs
the right url is http://www.apanet.pl/en/produkty_ippc24.html cheers, --nvieira ----- "Nuno Vieira - nfsi telecom" <[email protected]> wrote: > We use APANET powerswitches, and we are quite happy with them. > > 24 ports units, around 600 EUR per unit. > > www.apanet.pl > --- > Nuno Vieira > nfsi telecom, lda. > > [email protected] > Tel. (+351) 21 949 2300 - Fax (+351) 21 949 2301 > http://www.nfsi.pt/ > > > > ----- "Justin M. Streiner" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > As much as I hate to tear people away from the Intercage/Atrivo > > debacle > > and semi-tangential rants, I'll take one for the team and do it :) > > > > I have an opportunity coming up to rebuild an existing machine room > > space > > to an extent. It's not a total gut-and-refit, but I'll at least > get > > to > > put in some new infrastructure. That said, I'd be interested in > > hearing > > about peoples' experiences with various rackmountable managed PDUs. > > > > I have some Tripp Lite PDUMH30NETs that work well and are reasonably > > > priced, but they have a few quirks (no RS-232 console port, web > > interface > > seems to be a little shaky with Firefox, etc) that would become more > > > annoying when scaled up to several rows of new rack footprints. > I'm > > also > > open to using managed vertically mounted PDUs. The plan is for each > > > footprint to have "A" and B" feeds, so two PDUMH30NETs would take > up > > 4U > > per footprint, which is a bit much... > > > > I don't need to worry about distributing DC power - just AC. > > > > This site will be lights-out most of the time, so robust remote > > management > > capabilities are a must. > > > > Any thoughts/insight are greatly appreciated. > > > > jms
|