North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: rackmount managed PDUs

  • From: Nuno Vieira - nfsi telecom
  • Date: Thu Sep 25 12:55:31 2008

the right url is http://www.apanet.pl/en/produkty_ippc24.html

cheers,
--nvieira



----- "Nuno Vieira - nfsi telecom" <[email protected]> wrote:

> We use APANET powerswitches, and we are quite happy with them.
> 
> 24 ports units, around 600 EUR per unit.
> 
> www.apanet.pl
> ---
> Nuno Vieira
> nfsi telecom, lda.
> 
> [email protected]
> Tel. (+351) 21 949 2300 - Fax (+351) 21 949 2301
> http://www.nfsi.pt/
> 
> 
> 
> ----- "Justin M. Streiner" <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > As much as I hate to tear people away from the Intercage/Atrivo
> > debacle 
> > and semi-tangential rants, I'll take one for the team and do it :)
> > 
> > I have an opportunity coming up to rebuild an existing machine room
> > space 
> > to an extent.  It's not a total gut-and-refit, but I'll at least
> get
> > to 
> > put in some new infrastructure.  That said, I'd be interested in
> > hearing 
> > about peoples' experiences with various rackmountable managed PDUs.
> > 
> > I have some Tripp Lite PDUMH30NETs that work well and are reasonably
> 
> > priced, but they have a few quirks (no RS-232 console port, web
> > interface 
> > seems to be a little shaky with Firefox, etc) that would become more
> 
> > annoying when scaled up to several rows of new rack footprints. 
> I'm
> > also 
> > open to using managed vertically mounted PDUs.  The plan is for each
> 
> > footprint to have "A" and B" feeds, so two PDUMH30NETs would take
> up
> > 4U 
> > per footprint, which is a bit much...
> > 
> > I don't need to worry about distributing DC power - just AC.
> > 
> > This site will be lights-out most of the time, so robust remote
> > management 
> > capabilities are a must.
> > 
> > Any thoughts/insight are greatly appreciated.
> > 
> > jms