Re: GLBX De-Peers Intercage [Was: RE: Washington Post: Atrivo/Intercag e, w hy are we peering with the American RBN?]

• From: Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr.
• Date: Mon Sep 01 10:21:31 2008

• List-archive: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog>
• List-help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=help>
• List-id: North American Network Operators Group <nanog.nanog.org>
• List-post: <mailto:[email protected]>
• List-subscribe: <http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=subscribe>
• List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>

On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 08:48:12 -0000, Paul Ferguson said:

Is this an issue that network operations folk don't really care
about?

If somebody's paying you $n/megabyte for transit/connectivity, what's your
incentive to make them clean up their act and get rid of their P2P filesharing
traffic, spam traffic, and so on?

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: GLBX De-Peers Intercage [Was: RE: Washington Post: Atrivo/Intercag e, w hy are we peering with the American RBN?] bmanning
  • Re: GLBX De-Peers Intercage [Was: RE: Washington Post: Atrivo/Intercag e, w hy are we peering with the American RBN?] Valdis . Kletnieks

• References:
  • Re: GLBX De-Peers Intercage [Was: RE: Washington Post: Atrivo/Intercag e, w hy are we peering with the American RBN?] Paul Ferguson
  • Re: GLBX De-Peers Intercage [Was: RE: Washington Post: Atrivo/Intercag e, w hy are we peering with the American RBN?] Valdis . Kletnieks

• Prev by Date: Re: Force10 Gear - Opinions
• Next by Date: Re: GLBX De-Peers Intercage [Was: RE: Washington Post: Atrivo/Intercag e, w hy are we peering with the American RBN?]
• Date Index
• Thread Index
• Author Index
• Historical