|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: GLBX De-Peers Intercage [Was: RE: Washington Post: Atrivo/Intercag e, w hy are we peering with the American RBN?]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 - -- "Paul Ferguson" <[email protected]> wrote: >-- "Marc Sachs" <[email protected]> wrote: >>http://cidr-report.org/cgi-bin/as-report?as=AS27595&v=4&view=2.0 > >My only concern here is that by the publicity this issue continues >to receive, these activities will just move else where, like >scurrying cockroaches (like what happened with AS40989). > [some elided] I guess my effort to evoke commentary on NANOG failed. My next question to the peanut gallery is: What do you suggest we should do on other hosting IP blocks are are continuing to host criminal activity, even in the face of abuse reports, etc.? Seriously -- I think this is an issue which needs to be addressed here. ISPs cannot continue to sweep this issue under the proverbial carpet. Is this an issue that network operations folk don't really care about? - - ferg -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP Desktop 9.6.3 (Build 3017) wj8DBQFIu6xHq1pz9mNUZTMRAo1gAKCT0QCc65W1z8C5gsegsm6zBWDDCwCeLKac 7nVL8XmqOZiFfD18hFSFL/M= =8pXG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- "Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson Engineering Architecture for the Internet fergdawg(at)netzero.net ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/
|