North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: route policy (Re: Public shaming list for ISPs announcing other ISPs IP space by mistake)
On Fri, 15 Aug 2008 13:56:09 +0300 (EEST), Pekka Savola wrote: >I'm not sure I follow. Many of these aliens are in fact registered in >RADB, so AFAICS, there that is no reason for them to be registered in >RIPE DB. > >On the other hand, some want to register them in RIPE DB because some >operators just want to use RIPE DB e.g. for data consistency etc. >reasons. But putting data without practically any authorization in >RIPE DB doesn't seem to be a useful model in the long run. As I understand things, the "without practically any authorization" model holds for *everything* registered in the RADB. Right? If that's not a useful model for the RIPE DB, what about the RADB? --Sandy P.S. Not to pick on the RADB. Most IRRs, as I understand it, enforce little in the way of authorization. It's just that the RADB was mentioned.
|