Re: Is it time to abandon bogon prefix filters?

• From: Rob Evans
• Date: Wed Aug 06 12:06:20 2008

• List-archive: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog>
• List-help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=help>
• List-id: North American Network Operators Group <nanog.nanog.org>
• List-post: <mailto:[email protected]>
• List-subscribe: <http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=subscribe>
• List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>

> I see a number of hits on those entries, especially on 94/8.  and 0/8.

You do know that 94/8 has been assigned to the RIPE NCC, right? :-)

Cheers,
Rob

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Is it time to abandon bogon prefix filters? Justin Shore

• References:
  • Out of Date Bogon Prefix Nick Downey
  • Is it time to abandon bogon prefix filters? Leo Bicknell
  • Re: Is it time to abandon bogon prefix filters? Rob Thomas
  • Re: Is it time to abandon bogon prefix filters? Patrick W. Gilmore
  • Re: Is it time to abandon bogon prefix filters? Randy Bush
  • Re: Is it time to abandon bogon prefix filters? Justin Shore

• Prev by Date: Re: Is it time to abandon bogon prefix filters?
• Next by Date: Re: was bogon filters, now "Brief Segue on 1918"
• Date Index
• Thread Index
• Author Index
• Historical