North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

sizing router buffers (Re: Software router state of the art )

  • From: Mikael Abrahamsson
  • Date: Wed Jul 23 17:48:17 2008

On Wed, 23 Jul 2008, Kevin Oberman wrote:

be of any use at all. This would require 3 GB of buffers. This same
problem also make TCP off-load of no use at all.

3 Gigabyte? Why?


The newer 40G platforms on the market seems to have abandonded the 600ms buffers typical in the 10G space, in favour of 50-200ms of buffers (I don't remember exactly).

Aren't there TCP implementations that don't use exponential window increase, but instead can do smaller increments, which I would have believed would enable routers to still do well with ~50ms of buffering.

High speed memory is very expensive, also a lot of applications today would prefer to have their packets dropped instead of being queued for hundreds of milliseconds. Finding a good tradeoff level between the demand of different traffic types is quite hard...

Also, DWDM capacity seems to get cheaper all the time, so if you really need to move data at multigigabit speeds, it might make sense to just rent that 10G wave and put your own equipment there that does what you want.

--
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: [email protected]