North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: AS 54271

  • From: Christian Koch
  • Date: Sun Jul 13 16:40:30 2008

interestingly,  before july 7th these prefixes were originating from another
private as - 65501, until sometime that day routes were withdrawn from 65501
and began being announced from 54271...



On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 4:10 PM, Joel Jaeggli <[email protected]> wrote:

> Scott Morris wrote:
>
>> Wouldn't it be better to ask the folks in Hungary (AS20922) who are
>> peering
>> with this site?
>>
>
> These are or appear to be all 20922's prefixes...
>
> 54271 is a stub from my vantage points that only appears from behind 20992.
>
>  One side, I'd buy the typo.  Both sides, mutual typos are a little  more
>> difficult.
>>
>
> looks more like a lack of clue. off-hand I'd hazard that only one party is
> involved.
>
>
>  Not that conspiracy theories are all that much fun, but I'm finding the
>> one-sided mistake hard to believe.  Either that or the folks at AS20922
>> haven't figured out that an open bgp peer isn't a great idea!  :)
>>
>> Scott
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Joel Jaeggli [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Sunday, July 13, 2008
>> 1:36 PM
>> To: Marshall Eubanks
>> Cc: NANOG list
>> Subject: Re: AS 54271
>>
>> those prefixes all have ripe route object with origin AS 20922
>>
>> all the routes I see for a given prefix look like the following:
>>
>>   2914 1299 12301 8696 20922 54271
>>     129.250.0.171 from 129.250.0.171 (129.250.0.12)
>>       Origin IGP, metric 1, localpref 100, valid, external
>>       Community: 2914:420 2914:2000 2914:3000 65504:1299
>>
>>   2497 3257 12301 8696 20922 54271
>>     202.232.0.2 from 202.232.0.2 (202.232.0.2)
>>       Origin IGP, localpref 100, valid, external
>>
>>   7660 2516 3257 12301 8696 20922 54271
>>     203.181.248.168 from 203.181.248.168 (203.181.248.168)
>>       Origin IGP, localpref 100, valid, external
>>       Community: 2516:1030
>>
>> etc...
>>
>> Marshall Eubanks wrote:
>>
>>> As of this morning, I am seeing BGP from AS 54271
>>>
>>> *> 62.77.196.0/22   38.101.161.116        6991             0 174 3549
>>> 3549 3549 12301 8696 20922 54271 i
>>> *> 62.77.254.0/23   38.101.161.116        6991             0 174 3549
>>> 3549 3549 12301 8696 20922 54271 i
>>> *> 81.17.184.0/22   38.101.161.116        6991             0 174 3549
>>> 3549 3549 12301 8696 20922 54271 i
>>> *> 81.17.190.0/23   38.101.161.116        6991             0 174 3549
>>> 3549 3549 12301 8696 20922 54271 i
>>> *> 82.131.196.0/23  38.101.161.116        6991             0 174 3549
>>> 3549 3549 12301 8696 20922 54271 i
>>> *> 82.131.198.0/24  38.101.161.116        6991             0 174 3549
>>> 3549 3549 12301 8696 20922 54271 i
>>> *> 82.131.248.0/21  38.101.161.116        6991             0 174 3549
>>> 3549 3549 12301 8696 20922 54271 i
>>> *> 89.148.64.0/22   38.101.161.116        6991             0 174 3549
>>> 3549 3549 12301 8696 20922 54271 i
>>> *> 89.148.70.0/23   38.101.161.116        6991             0 174 3549
>>> 3549 3549 12301 8696 20922 54271 i
>>> *> 89.148.72.0/23   38.101.161.116        6991             0 174 3549
>>> 3549 3549 12301 8696 20922 54271 i
>>> *> 89.148.78.0/23   38.101.161.116        6991             0 174 3549
>>> 3549 3549 12301 8696 20922 54271 i
>>> *> 89.148.82.0/23   38.101.161.116        6991             0 174 3549
>>> 3549 3549 12301 8696 20922 54271 i
>>> *> 89.148.96.0/23   38.101.161.116        6991             0 174 3549
>>> 3549 3549 12301 8696 20922 54271 i
>>> *> 89.148.99.0/24   38.101.161.116        6991             0 174 3549
>>> 3549 3549 12301 8696 20922 54271 i
>>>
>>> This ASN has not been assigned to any RIR. Is this a bogon, or does
>>> anyone know of a legitimate reason for this ?
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Marshall
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>


-- 
^christian$