Re: Multiple DNS implementations vulnerable to cache poisoning

• From: Phil Regnauld
• Date: Thu Jul 10 09:31:32 2008

• List-archive: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog>
• List-help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=help>
• List-id: North American Network Operators Group <nanog.nanog.org>
• List-post: <mailto:[email protected]>
• List-subscribe: <http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=subscribe>
• List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>

Eric Davis (eric) writes:
> Anyone using Infoblox DNSOne?  They claimed to have fixed their BIND version
> but I still see issues with source ports staying the same.

	Which version are you running of the OS ?

• References:
  • Re: Multiple DNS implementations vulnerable to cache poisoning Patrick W. Gilmore
  • RE: Multiple DNS implementations vulnerable to cache poisoning Eric Davis

• Prev by Date: Re: Multiple DNS implementations vulnerable to cache poisoning
• Next by Date: Big delays at Sprint or Verizon network?
• Date Index
• Thread Index
• Author Index
• Historical