Re: Multiple DNS implementations vulnerable to cache poisoning

• From: Randy Bush
• Date: Wed Jul 09 17:53:01 2008

• List-archive: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog>
• List-help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=help>
• List-id: North American Network Operators Group <nanog.nanog.org>
• List-post: <mailto:[email protected]>
• List-subscribe: <http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=subscribe>
• List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>

> There are 4 ccTLDs (se, bg, pr, br) that are signed.

wanna crawl in a corner in dublin and i can sign a few?

randy

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Multiple DNS implementations vulnerable to cache poisoning David Conrad

• References:
  • Multiple DNS implementations vulnerable to cache poisoning Buhrmaster, Gary
  • Re: Multiple DNS implementations vulnerable to cache poisoning Steven M. Bellovin
  • Re: Multiple DNS implementations vulnerable to cache poisoning Christopher Morrow
  • Re: Multiple DNS implementations vulnerable to cache poisoning David Conrad

• Prev by Date: RE: Multiple DNS implementations vulnerable to cache poisoning
• Next by Date: Re: Multiple DNS implementations vulnerable to cache poisoning
• Date Index
• Thread Index
• Author Index
• Historical