|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: Mail Server best practices - was: Pandora's Box of new TLDs
>On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 05:25:16PM -0500, > Chris Owen <[email protected]> wrote > a message of 53 lines which said: >It is because, if someone reports (by telephone, IRC or IRL) that he >sent an email and I did not receive it, I regard as VERY IMPORTANT to >be able to check the spam folder (with a search tool, not by hand) and >go back to him saying "No, we really did not receive it". In article <!&!AAAAAAAAAAAuAAAAAAAAAKTyXRN5/+lGvU59a+P7CFMBAN6gY+ZG84BMpVQcAbDh1IQAA [email protected]>, Frank Bulk - iNAME <[email protected]> writes >You mean, you don't employ *any* spam mitigation techniques besides sorting? >Because if you do anything, even as basic as RBLs, you're not being >consistent with your stance. I agree completely with Chris Owen's approach, even though I use spam mitigation techniques. The reason for this is because those "lost" emails that I very occasionally rescue from the spam bucket are: NOT sent by someone on an RBL NOT sent to an unpublished and unused address (eg [email protected]) etc. -- Roland Perry
|