North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: Mail Server best practices - was: Pandora's Box of new TLDs

  • From: Chris Owen
  • Date: Sat Jun 28 18:25:27 2008

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Jun 28, 2008, at 4:56 PM, Jean-François Mezei wrote:

The biggest problem however are outfits like microsoft whose hotmail/ msn
properties have undocumented logic which confirm reception of the
message at the SMTP/821 level but then proceed to discard the email
instead of delivering it to the person's inbox (or spam folder).

At some point what is the difference between putting the mail into a spam folder and sending them to /dev/null?


Yesterday I received 4,932 emails. 294 of those went into my inbox. 36 of those went info my quarantine folder. The other 4,602 went straight to /dev/null (actually many of them went through various blacklist building scripts first). Had I put the full 4,638 into a "spam folder" that would have been completely worthless. It would be impossible for me to actually review all those emails. Ultimately, there wouldn't be any difference between that and /dev/null. The only difference is I would have deleted them later rather than when they came in.

So should I have bounced all 4,602? Since ninety some percent of them came from forged addresses that would not only be pointless but would be contributing to the problem (and get us into bl.spamcop.com).

The size of the problem presented by spam is just enormous. Before we started selective greylisting, we used to accept a million messages a day. Of those we only delivered about 50,000. And that's for a system only handling about 5,000 email accounts. I can't even imagine having to do that on the scale hotmail is talking about.

Chris

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Chris Owen         ~ Garden City (620) 275-1900 ~  Lottery (noun):
President          ~ Wichita     (316) 858-3000 ~    A stupidity tax
Hubris Communications Inc      www.hubris.net
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin)
Comment: Public Key: http://home.hubris.net/owenc/pgpkey.txt
Comment: Public Key ID: 0xB513D9DD

iEYEARECAAYFAkhmukwACgkQElUlCLUT2d0yNgCfRhVBqk3lo3X4p6pVJ8i32c4F
MIEAn18tJAhIhgvWtIbuqLxFR7TKJB/q
=Cump
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----