Re: .255 addresses still not usable after all these years?

• From: Scott Weeks
• Date: Sun Jun 15 00:13:55 2008

• List-archive: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog>
• List-help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=help>
• List-id: North American Network Operators Group <nanog.nanog.org>
• List-post: <mailto:[email protected]>
• List-subscribe: <http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=subscribe>
• List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>

I don't get it.  As I mentioned about a year ago, when we last had this discussion, I have been handing out /23s to DHCP customers for years.  No problems.  .0 and .255 are not on WAN circuits or anything else, but zero problems for dynamically assigned customers.

scott

• Prev by Date: Re: [NANOG] Introducing latency for testing?
• Next by Date: Re: NANOG Digest, Vol 5, Issue 33
• Date Index
• Thread Index
• Author Index
• Historical