North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: amazonaws.com?
On Thu, 29 May 2008, Dorn Hetzel wrote: There is a really huge difference in the ease with which payment from a credit card can be reversed if fraudulent, and the amount of effort necessary to reverse a wire transfer. A mere "court subpoena" wouldn't even be remotely sufficient. The person wanting their money back would pretty much have to sue for it and win.
I suspect that for Amazon, it is easier and cheaper for them to screw us and allow spam to flow out port 25 unhindered (which costs US money and time) than it is to implement something that makes them a good Internet citizen (which costs AMAZON money and time). Maybe they'll change their stance, but I suspect it is a business decision to not block port 25 and hang out on blacklists, not a good Internet citizen decision. My position from the beginning of this thread is that you cannot AUP this problem away, nor can you just "charge more" and hope THAT will stop it, nor can you simply improve and perfect anti-fraud systems so spammers and fraudsters cannot gain access to your services. It's free to do nothing, and there is a cost of doing something. There are no laws that say what Amazon is doing is illegal, either. You have choices: null route them, blacklist them, get a group together (NANOG?) and group null route Amazon's EC2 IP blocks until they bow to your demands. Being on the 'net means spam, DOS attacks, being slashdotted, dealing with bad Internet citizens, etc. Either you accept those facts, or you should give up and go unplug your connection. With a backhoe, preferably. Much more fun. Beckman --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Peter Beckman Internet Guy [email protected] http://www.angryox.com/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|