North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: amazonaws.com?
On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 1:28 PM, Colin Alston <[email protected]> wrote: > Much like any large datacenter or hosting provider it is not feasible to > police every packet in and out of the network, I assume "The World" has lots Not a question of packet policing as much as having sufficient controls in place to get rid of card fraud, regular audits etc .. and THEN looking for obvious signs of abuse, proactively (inbound and outbound traffic flow analysis, passive dns checks and a whole host of other things that are possible). The second thing is, of course, having an active abuse desk, but by the time an abuse desk gets around to reading and responding to the complaint, the damage is done (1 business day is a very good turnaround indeed, at shops rather larger than world.std.com). > (unless you have evidence to suggest the contrary). As a corollary to this I > was simply noting that their terms do not include the ability to SMTP at all > and as such the ranges are left in any blacklists they might fall into. You With respect, in such cases, amazon is better off firewalling outbound port 25 (or indeed, outbound anything at all) for accounts that dont specifically ask for it. Quite a lot of EC2 compute time is for number crunching and such - not just hosting, or email, or .. srs
|