North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Historical
Re: [Nanog-futures] Announce list: Re: Hughes Network
- From: Marshall Eubanks
- Date: Fri May 23 11:37:50 2008
On May 23, 2008, at 9:59 AM, Sam Stickland wrote:
Joe Abley wrote:
On 22 May 2008, at 23:16, James R. Cutler wrote:
The announcement was made to nanog-announce, but not to nanog. I
would expect that there are scads more readers of nanog than of
nanog announce.
When I was sending things to nanog-announce, it was the case that
mail to nanog-announce was sent to people who had specifically
subscribed to that list, plus anybody who hadn't but who was
subscribed to nanog (in other words, it was sent to the union of
both lists).
That might have changed since the transition to mailman. It seemed
like a useful approach, though.
Kinda makes you wonder what the purpose on the announce list is
though.
IMHO the purpose is (or should be) that the posting-privileges for
announce is limited, so that messages from
that list about things like changes in format or meeting times can be
treated as authoritative.
Regards
Marshall
Are there actually people subscribed to nanog-annouce that aren't
subscribed to nanog?
Sam
|