North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: Hughes Network

  • From: Michael Holstein
  • Date: Thu May 22 13:56:57 2008

Has anyone else noticed that the [NANOG] prefix has been missing
intermittently from the list traffic over the last couple of days?

Different SMTP servers, it appears (looks like they might have been using an Ironport box to do anti-spam, and it was probably doing the subject re-writes as well)

With the [NANOG] in subject :

received: from linuxbox.org ([24.155.83.21])
	by thor.merit.edu with ESMTP; 20 May 2008 10:27:41 -0400

Without the subject tag :

Received: from nameserver2.ttec.com ([64.95.32.37] helo=smtp.ttec.com)
	by s0.nanog.org with esmtp (Exim 4.68 (FreeBSD))
	(envelope-from <[email protected]>) id 1JzEFp-0006tP-1S
	for [email protected]; Thu, 22 May 2008 17:07:01 +0000


Cheers,

Michael Holstein
Cleveland State University