|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: [NANOG] BCP Muni WiFI?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Greetings, Interesting comment Paul. However, 16e and evdo are a "bit" heavy with infrastructure to support mobility. Before giving that answer, you may want to ask Deepak if he NEEDS mobility.... Chris On 16 May 2008, at 10.23, Paul Wall wrote: > On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 4:21 PM, Deepak Jain <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Are there any good (published) BCPs for building out Municipal WiFi >> networks? Particularly in the security/authentication/scaling areas? > > BCP #58,271,432--which basically states "Don't," comes highly > recommended. > > Instead, investigate your nearest .16e or evdo rev. A reseller. In the > case of .16e, most available APN's are built around user and > transport/transit abstractions, assuming shared-facilities, virtual > providers, etc. The equipment used in both is a far cry from anything > 802.11. > > p. > > _______________________________________________ > NANOG mailing list > [email protected] > http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog > - --- ææç Check my PGP key here: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCB67593B -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJILcx7AAoJEGmx2Mt/+Iw/20UIAJjNOQ7JSbE8/iqGbuFZPEVX AvQ/eRPHT6BhLXNSg5WZiL4aQcDeLhkMYwhpJTMkslHg5hveQHN/pUQB9pkMeqCZ jffRbiKDzypaDf8q/Rx1vORO/bnQ4R27AfeKDc75Z07YewdBa9PKZz2EgsjVHQmp FNDq9dVDWAI+scK3BFNge+QNeXatYUf0gP+LnRmNaPu+KZBThjD+Wmd6FWlfmuRa GxvTOrESrbhRxrnF128B5RXa/GBohduiql1jrU0phb6w2a/NJbd+a4yvHANZpBHk fwU3BrZKLixRtOOM3uA4ZPgliTUO/lD4tpW8SEWnvluhRe1tTIrmgf4qjxit5gA= =z83n -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog
|