|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical RE: latency (was: RE: cooling door)
Thanks for the clarification; that's why I put the "seems to" in the reply. Fred Reimer, CISSP, CCNP, CQS-VPN, CQS-ISS Senior Network Engineer Coleman Technologies, Inc. 954-298-1697 > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > Mikael Abrahamsson > Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2008 12:30 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: latency (was: RE: cooling door) > > > On Sun, 30 Mar 2008, Fred Reimer wrote: > > > application to take advantage of the networks' capabilities. Mikael > (seems > > to) complain that developers have to put latency inducing > applications into > > the development environment. I'd say that those developers are some > of the > > few who actually have a clue, and are doing the right thing. > > I was definately not complaining, I brought it up as an example where > developers have clue and where they're doing the right thing. > > I've too often been involved in customer complaints which ended up > being > the fault of Microsoft SMB and the customers having the firm idea that > it > must be a network problem since MS is a world standard and that can't > be > changed. Even proposing to change TCP Window settings to get FTP > transfers > quicker is met with the same sceptisism. > > Even after describing to them about the propagation delay of light in > fiber and the physical limitations, they're still very suspicious about > it > all. > > -- > Mikael Abrahamsson email: [email protected] Attachment:
smime.p7s
|