North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: 10GE router resource

  • From: ann kok
  • Date: Tue Mar 25 15:26:48 2008
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=j5he20JLOsxgoK4XnDuPtHV/JuvzIs9LUztQKc0JecskkWdq/mvv7YzZ1kzBwH3U4y0/Af/Vxkqrhjp/PjzahkbajhCf/6eJut4HmxSholb4g9NAkejT9na0ybk3J3t3lv7qApd+YS+M31yC38yZUXZK3SkumrvE7IpPYmCapwI=;

Hi Chris

Could you share your opensouce 10G info for me?

For the past 8 months, I have problem to use the 10G
in linux system. I have to continuous to upgrade the
hardwares...

my existing system is using  the new CPU now, 4G
memory, 1 x 10G card plus several 1G NICs.
Intel 2 Ext CPU X9650  @ 3.00GHz
All CPU is in 100% used when it is in 4G totally
(download + upload). 

thank you so much


--- Chris Grundemann <[email protected]> wrote:

> Greg has laid out a great bit of information and I
> would like to add just
> one possibility to the list of budget 10GE routers:
> Vyatta.  According to a
> recent press release from that company (
> http://www.vyatta.com/about/pressreleases.php?id=51)
> they offer a product
> that is "2 to 3X higher performance at a cost
> savings of more than 75
> percent" when compared to Cisco's 7200. 
> Unfortunately I have not had the
> opportunity to test or use the Vyatta routers yet; I
> have however
> successfully used other open-source Linux based
> routers in the past with
> great success.  If  you are looking for a truly
> budget 10GE router, they may
> be worth adding to the list and looking into.
> 
> On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 10:36 AM, Greg VILLAIN
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> >
> >
> > On Mar 24, 2008, at 10:23 AM, user user wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi everybody!
> > >
> > > I find myself in the market for some 10GE
> routers. As
> > > I don't buy these everyday, I was wondering if
> any of
> > > you guys had any good resources for evaluating
> > > different vendors and models. I'm mainly
> thinking
> > > about non-vendor resources as the vendorspeak
> sites
> > > are not that hard to find.
> > >
> > > Also I'd love to hear recommendatios for
> "budget" 10GE
> > > routers. The "budget" router would be used to
> hook up
> > > client networks through one 10GE interface and
> connect
> > > to different transit providers through two 10GE
> > > interfaces.
> > >
> > > - Zed
> >
> > Hiya,
> >
> > When it comes to budget, force10 are good. I
> wouldn't be able to
> > confirm if they're worth performance-wise.
> > I'd strongly suggest Foundry, I'm a big fan of
> their kits, price-wise
> > and performance-wise, provided you do not need
> rocket-science features.
> > MLX/XMR models will surely do the trick perfectly.
> >
> > When it comes to router purchasing habits, we all
> tend to get
> > religious...
> > Bottom line is that most of the 'regular' vendors
> (namely Cisco,
> > Juniper, Foundry, Force10, Extreme, Riverstone)
> implement pretty much
> > the same set of features, which are all IETF/IEEE
> normalized, meaning
> > if you don't need proprietary features (and you'll
> wish you don't),
> > any router will be fine, the only difference will
> come from:
> > - the chassis being non-blocking or not (i.e.
> backplane design)
> > - the price per port
> > - the operating OS
> > - the feeling you'll get with the salesperson, and
> the reputation of
> > their Support Teams.
> > - vendor specific features such as Flow Sampling
> > To make it simple, most vendors have an IOS like
> OS, except Juniper
> > which has a really clever and elegant OS, but are
> very pricey.
> > Foundry and Force10 have the cheapest price per
> port
> > Cisco does only Netflow, Foundry & Force10 only
> SFlow (which is a true
> > standard) and I think Juniper does JFlow
> > Cisco's kits are packed with proprietary protocols
> (HSRP and GLBP
> > instead of VRRP, their own ethernet trunking,
> EIGRP as their own and
> > yet extremely efficient IGP, TCL scriptable
> CLI...) , some of them are
> > really good, some are crappy, but I suggest you'd
> stick with IEEE/IETF
> > protocol to avoid future trouble.
> >
> > One thing: RSTP/802-1w is very (very, very, very)
> not often
> > interoperable between vendors who all have their
> own interpretation of
> > the norm and can quickly turn into a nightmare.
> > I'd strongly suggest try&buys if (R)STP
> interoperability is required,
> > but I'm a little paranoid :)
> >
> > Greg VILLAIN
> > Independant Network & Telco Architecture
> Consultant
> >
> >
> >
> 
> 
> -- 
> "Those who do not create the future they want must
> endure the future they
> get."
> ~Draper L. Kaufman, Jr.
> --
> 



      ____________________________________________________________________________________
Looking for last minute shopping deals?  
Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.  http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping