North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical
Re: mtu mis-match
On Wed, 19 Mar 2008, ann kok wrote:
I have this problem about mtu mismatch
Are you using PPPoE to transport and manage your DSL users, or are they bridged?
Ping packets, unless you specifically use a larger packet size, are usually pretty small. Try running ping tests with a larger packet size, say, 1495 bytes, and see if those fail.
HTTP, SSH, etc, can easily (and often do) generate packets up to the maximum segment size. That's why MTU mismatches can seem to affect some types of traffic but not others.
The 'lowest common denominator' for MTUs is often 1500 bytes, but protocols that need to wrap or tunnel existing packets (GRE, PPPoE, IPSEC, etc) impose some overhead of their own. Unless the MTU or TCP maximum segment size of the original traffic is reduced a bit, the tunneled packets will need to be fragmented for transport across the network. This can lead to performance problems like the ones you're seeing. The magic number for an MTU on PPPoE DSL is 1492 bytes, based on past DSL aggregation work I've done.