North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: Transition Planning for IPv6 as mandated by the US Govt

  • From: Larry J. Blunk
  • Date: Mon Mar 17 23:23:31 2008

Randy Bush wrote:
I believe whoever shows off a functional NAT-PT device at the next NANOG
might get some praise. I heard it was a bit of a disaster.

by the time the show got to apnic/apricot the week after nanog, we had the cisco implementation of nat-pt and totd working and it worked well.

  And the NAT-PT implementation at NANOG (naptd) did seem
to work once some configuration issues were ironed out.   Unfortunately,
this was not resolved until the very end of the meeting.