North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

RE: [admin] [summary] RE: YouTube IP Hijacking

  • From: Barry Greene (bgreene)
  • Date: Mon Feb 25 17:39:16 2008
  • Authentication-results: sj-dkim-3; [email protected]; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/sjdkim3002 verified; );
  • Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=730; t=1203977817; x=1204841817; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim3002; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; [email protected]; z=From:=20=22Barry=20Greene=20(bgreene)=22=20<[email protected] com> |Subject:=20RE=3A=20[admin]=20[summary]=20RE=3A=20YouTube=2 0IP=20Hijacking |Sender:=20; bh=ZIuul52v5Ptfh37EYlwUHa68tH4BXVj0DGqj4kqbMQg=; b=KpgXykyoiEosOmxV4yy3yYkiafaXl/113pdNVAT5UueqHKl6uJhku+9gqK XH+YfguMr/QtePBNEQdZDbqQB3m1N1wRlOhfVwD3KD9Rr5KAr/ARJTYAnMWo p4qb/DMXlQ;
 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

 
 
> There have been two or three panels on this exact topic in 
> the past, you can find them in the index of talks.
> Unfortunately, the problem hasn't changed at all.  Perhaps we 
> could just replay those video streams :-)

My $.02 - http://www.getit.org/wordpress/?p=82

The irony to one of those, is that in NANOG 25 right before my session
which pointed out this continued threat vector,  we had Protecting the
BGP Routes to Top Level DNS Servers
http://www.nanog.org/mtg-0206/bush.html.


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.1

iQA/AwUBR8M5ib/UEA/xivvmEQISnwCgojEcUx7dyMBQPP59gZjdLgQeqqMAoL0p
seCMm+llF8tkr+pGf7LlyXrW
=6jfG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----