|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical RE: YouTube IP Hijacking
This is a very interesting site. However, I notice that, in the "all in the last 24 hours" it doesn't show the YouTube hijack. It does have a lot of entries for 17557, most recently on 2/17. How reliable is this system? > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of Hank Nussbacher > Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2008 11:33 PM > To: Steven M. Bellovin; [email protected] > Subject: Re: YouTube IP Hijacking > > > At 05:31 AM 25-02-08 +0000, Steven M. Bellovin wrote: > > >Seriously -- a number of us have been warning that this could happen. > >More precisely, we've been warning that this could happen > *again*; we > >all know about many older incidents, from the barely noticed to the > >very noisy. (AS 7007, anyone?) Something like S-BGP will > stop this cold. > > > >Yes, I know there are serious deployment and operational > issues. The > >question is this: when is the pain from routing incidents > great enough > >that we're forced to act? It would have been nice to have done > >something before this, since now all the world's script kiddies have > >seen what can be done. > > "we've been warning that this could happen *again*" - this is > happening every day - just look to: > http://cs.unm.edu/~karlinjf/IAR/prefix.php?filter=most > http://cs.unm.edu/~karlinjf/IAR/subprefix.php?filter=most > for samples. Thing is - these prefix hijacks are not big > ticket sites like Youtube or Microsoft or Cisco or even > whitehouse.gov - but rather just sites that never make it > onto the NANOG radar. > > -Hank > > > >
|