North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: Lessons from the AU model
Andy Davidson wrote: Yes. (I just did some legwork and read the WAIX policies, and it seems to be mandatory here) This surprises me, Multi-lateral peering is great for lots of networks, but really bad for others, and (if forced) probably acts as a barrier to the bigger networks from taking part in any public peering ....Well, there's basically only 5 networks of any size that don't participate (Telstra, Optus Singtel, AAPT TNZ, MCI and SPT (AS9942) who aren't that big). So, clearly it's not a big issue. What's interesting is the kinds of people that DO participate (Asia Netcom, VSNL (Oz only) etc). It's an issue. But overall it's not big enough of one. We all gain a lot more by peering together than not. Yeah - I can understand why MLP is not big elsewhere (we peer in the US so I do the peering there - it's very different, but also the traffic levels are very different. We all share a lot of content here and so the savings amongst 7 of the 10 top broadband companies in Oz make it all worth while. MLP is what works here - the GoF believe that their transit is special and won't peer with anyone else in Oz. It's partially a government mistake from the late 90s. MMC
"The difficulty lies, not in the new ideas, but in escaping from the old ones" - John Maynard Keynes
|