North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: ISPs slowing P2P traffic...
Stephane Bortzmeyer (bortzmeyer) writes: > > > that appears on most packaged foods in the States, that ISPs put on > > their Web sites and advertisements. I'm willing to disclose that we > > block certain ports [...] > > As a consumer, I would say YES. And FCC should mandates it. ... and if the FCC doesn't mandate it, maybe we'll see some self-labelling, just like the some food producers have been doing in a few countries ("this doesn't contain preservatives") in the absence of formal regulation. > Practically speaking, you may find the RFC 4084 "Terminology for > Describing Internet Connectivity" interesting: Agreed. Something describing Internet service, and breaking it down into "essential components" such as: - end-to-end IP (NAT/NO NAT) - IPv6 availability (Y/N/timeline) - transparent HTTP redirection or not - DNS catchall or not - possibilities to enable/disable and cost - port filtering/throttling if any (P2P, SIP, ...) - respect of evil bit
|