North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Historical
Re: Stupid Question: Network Abuse RFC?
- From: Suresh Ramasubramanian
- Date: Sun Jan 13 19:59:05 2008
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=084ASR9UCi5mLEgls4uNoDNp6MjTuzqInLPBzUui4ZY=; b=H2P7rf1IVi50p3m76e0/x1S2bOvWqHJyYnicYME5WrxUu997BJ1tlTBfdDNn8sdWi9zicqpD6TCeR9fKHCO3fFo0Fi6Y27YypskftI+Ts7/snbU/rJbIsivRtO5R2STQULiPhM3l7tEsb/dLzKDwUiKWb5tjzsUIAwu+YgXi6iA=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=IcJ1Kqk85LuTvqXsOp9n0B+J1ykF1f/+/h8jYzlOnCthHnLUl/cXXTtGGIi1HeeQUWuG7IqmeZazt96hTEoo5uzENtpi5dkvQ1rFHVMZpLOS3XMTbv6VsZ+KR77saeDtr01m901f2qLBtB33z4xheaXQ6LLjQqb0LJjK1N7z8TI=
On Jan 14, 2008 12:39 AM, Sean Donelan <[email protected]> wrote:
> Although you need a some overlap, I think you get much better "buy-in"
> when people from the same industry are developing their operational
> standards.
Well, MAAWG does that, and has produced a lot of good work in the
past. Has the same ISPs that come to NANOG, NSPSEC etc too, and in
some cases the same people.
So is that a call for *NOGs to come out with operational BCPs (no, not
"standards")?
--srs
|