North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Historical
Re: Stupid Question: Network Abuse RFC?
- From: Steve Atkins
- Date: Sun Jan 13 01:48:42 2008
On Jan 12, 2008, at 9:58 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
On Jan 13, 2008 12:43 AM, Paul Ferguson <[email protected]> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
- -- Randy Bush <[email protected]> wrote:
2142
but i am surprised you asked here instead of an ietf list. here we
actually do the stuff, not tell other folk how they should do it. :)
Thanks for the pointer, and I even appreciate you snarky reply. :-)
2142 isn't really related to abuse much, other than suggesting
use of the [email protected] and [email protected] aliases for reporting. I can't think
of any other docs that are abuse related, useful and RFCs, though.
There was also some work ongoing in INCH, that included some
machine-parsable reporting formats (RID I believe... Ms Moriarty's
work, if I remember correctly)
ARF too, if the abuse is email-based.
http://www.shaftek.org/publications/drafts/abuse-report/
http://wordtothewise.com/resources/arf.html
Cheers,
Steve
|