|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: Q: What do ISPs really think about security issues?
On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 09:20:05AM +0000, Paul Ferguson wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > As some of you may know, my primary job these days is tracking down > Bad Guys (tm), identifying threats, etc. > > But enough of that. > > One of my primary concerns has been, unsuccessfully, engaging the > networking community. > > Why is that? > > This "issue" is not imagined, nor is it a scare tactic -- it has, > for lack of a better analogy, grown in proportions only proportional > to the lack of engagement from ISPs. > > ISPs have really, really been absent from the discussion, for various > reasons. What discussions do you vaguely speak of? nsp-sec? nsp-sec BoF @ NANOG? FIRST? it-scc.org? commscc.org? IT-ISAC? NCS? the ITU-D Cybersecurity stuff? NSTAC? There's all sorts of forums that relate to security that are defined by different criteria or self-selecting. > Is this a topic that the NANOG community would like to discuss in > a serious manner? I think it'd discussed at NANOG and even has it's own BoF. Without you providing more context of what you mean, it's hard to say. > I'm just curious, because I'm considering submitting a "lightning > talk" at the upcoming San Jose NANOG, just to gauge & present some > of the major issues that we are seeing that could really use your > assistance. - Jared -- Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from [email protected] clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/ My statements are only mine.
|