|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical IPv6 Reality Check [Was: Re: IPv6 connectivity mandates?]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 - -- [email protected] wrote: >On Mon, 07 Jan 2008 14:58:27 EST, "Justin M. Streiner" said: >> Has anyone seen any indication that, given the US government's push to >> deploy IPv6, they will start (or perhaps they've started already?) >> writing mandates for applicant networks to have IPv6 connectivity into >> the >> requirements for federally funded grants? > >I haven't seen any. But we've been doing IPv6 for so long that it >wouldn't make a notice in our network group - people would just check it off as "BTDT", perhaps after calling our helpdesk and asking "Do we have it" and being told "Yes". > As with most Internet-related issues, the "market" will indeed decide. It amazes me how many times we revisit this issue. :-) - - ferg -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP Desktop 9.6.3 (Build 3017) wj8DBQFHhGh+q1pz9mNUZTMRAnM9AKDjm8KzlJSEA7C7mOOcSSY0AEIg1QCfbax7 modWuSZPtckh6auU5jztER4= =iLJ+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- "Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson Engineering Architecture for the Internet fergdawg(at)netzero.net ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/ Please note: message attached |