North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: v6 subnet size for DSL & leased line customers

  • From: Marshall Eubanks
  • Date: Sat Dec 29 15:18:33 2007

On Dec 27, 2007, at 11:19 PM, Mark Smith wrote:

On Fri, 28 Dec 2007 12:57:45 +0900 Randy Bush <[email protected]> wrote:

Ever calculated how many Ethernet nodes you can attach to a single LAN
with 2^46 unicast addresses?

you mean operationally successfully, or just for marketing glossies?

Theoretically. What I find a bit hard to understand is peoples'
seemingly complete acceptance of the 'gross' amount of ethernet address
space there is available with 46 bits available for unicast addressing
on a single LAN segment, yet confusion and struggle over the allocation
of additional IPv6 bits addressing bits for the same purpose - the
operational convenience of having addressing "work out of the box" or
be simpler to understand and easier to work with.

Once I realised that IPv6's fixed sized node addressing model was
similar to Ethernet's, I then started wondering why Ethernet was like
it was - and then found a paper that explains it :

"48-bit Absolute Internet and Ethernet Host Numbers"

Would it be possible to find the even part of this paper ? This version only has the odd numbered pages.




"Sheep are slow and tasty, and therefore must remain constantly
- Bruce Schneier, "Beyond Fear"