North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: v6 subnet size for DSL & leased line customers

  • From: Mark Smith
  • Date: Sun Dec 23 18:14:00 2007

On Sun, 23 Dec 2007 19:46:26 +0100
Florian Weimer <[email protected]> wrote:

> * Joe Greco:
> >> Right now, we might say "wow, 256 subnets for a single end-user... 
> >> hogwash!" and in years to come, "wow, only 256 subnets... what were we 
> >> thinking!?"
> >
> > Well, what's the likelihood of the "only 256 subnets" problem?
> There's a tendency to move away from (simulated) shared media networks.
> "One host per subnet" might become the norm.

Or possibly maybe Peter M. Gleitz's and Steven M. Bellovin's idea of

"Transient Addressing for Related Processes: Improved Firewalling by Using IPV6 and Multiple Addresses per Host"

A /64 per host is probably not necessary, however if an end-site has
a /48, that's 65K hosts so it wouldn't likely be much of a problem for
most sites ... certainly not my house currently or in the forseeable
future or my current employer, or most employers I've worked for in the


        "Sheep are slow and tasty, and therefore must remain constantly
                                   - Bruce Schneier, "Beyond Fear"