North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Re: unwise filtering policy from cox.net
- From: Suresh Ramasubramanian
- Date: Wed Nov 21 08:38:01 2007
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=n5kq/NOI5dxuksKVTmOUQUcGC/Byeoodx2LUX7pOyO8=; b=HB5aqhCseR6Mh08Mx/eiOnX3glVVfCtpJRwD/c/hRX1ecZumSQThX8dd5LRjUjDIqr3wZ1YVdt20hodQY9yHCLvTzU7GQihyXMsSFogKqj7o9zqYDrWjxUvv55ro6JHGyl5reZ+/DgRaigPlC3uT+B02HE7nduRLJ9uV/CCApFs=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=oahLpx+mNNv4XDPQiGfZrlaH/iqe0qi+2sDFaHh/JS0Pm9X+miS1/xUNh2f5PYMJRPwxi/CXz8bM3Y5EeL7J5xPwOnNoN9AaEUnqqAmwtWBBqStWZNGUELcoVUmF5v+XvTbB4h4WBV98a3Yysw5yoZxMcnX2olaghkxqnoS8++k=
On Nov 21, 2007 6:21 PM, Eliot Lear <[email protected]> wrote:
> Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> > Most mailservers do allow you to exempt specific addresses from filtering.
> On the LHS of the @ of a remote address? I think that was Sean's point.
Er, that bounce was from cox's mta, spamfiltering email to [email protected]
Suresh Ramasubramanian ([email protected])