North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Historical
Re: unwise filtering policy from cox.net
- From: Eliot Lear
- Date: Wed Nov 21 07:53:41 2007
- Authentication-results: ams-dkim-2; [email protected]; dkim=pass (s ig from cisco.com/amsdkim2001 verified; );
- Dkim-signature: v=0.5; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=200; t=1195649475; x=1196513475; c=relaxed/simple; s=amsdkim2001; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; [email protected]; z=From:=20Eliot=20Lear=20<[email protected]> |Subject:=20Re=3A=20unwise=20filtering=20policy=20from=20cox.net |Sender:=20; bh=e7AGnU3mqzZhIfqSRCbhCksEtabytiSjsTHX9eMNo/8=; b=I0NIXhMSZ8nuIjmQyiRsXbDXr8Cvgc9hBAYgjTFhvRKCbUy3DqewtaVqKrWQY6T6a9AcFXi5 7+g1Nu9JqB4K2ERhdE7Ickb5GnM1iknZUstD2QhEIplOslUAjPzkKMMc;
Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> Most mailservers do allow you to exempt specific addresses from filtering.
>
On the LHS of the @ of a remote address? I think that was Sean's point.
Eliot
|