North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical
RE: unwise filtering policy from cox.net
Heh better then my all time favorite was the "mailbox is full" reply from an [email protected] address for an ISP based in Nigeria who had a few servers trying to open umpteen fraud accounts :D -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of [email protected] Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2007 2:21 PM To: '[email protected]' Subject: unwise filtering policy from cox.net if anyone from cox.net is reading... ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors ----- <[email protected]> (reason: 552 5.2.0 F77u1Y00B2ccxfT0000000 Message Refused. A URL in the content of your message was found on...uribl.com. For resolution do not contact Cox Communications, contact the block list administrators.) This seems a rather unwise policy on behalf of cox.net -- their customers can originate scam emails, but cox.net abuse desk apparently does not care to hear about it.