North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

RE: unwise filtering policy from cox.net

  • From: Raymond L. Corbin
  • Date: Tue Nov 20 18:51:29 2007 
Heh better then my all time favorite was the "mailbox is full" reply
from an [email protected] address for an ISP based in Nigeria who had a few servers
trying to open umpteen fraud accounts :D

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
[email protected]
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2007 2:21 PM
To: '[email protected]'
Subject: unwise filtering policy from cox.net


if anyone from cox.net is reading...

    ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
<[email protected]>
     (reason: 552 5.2.0 F77u1Y00B2ccxfT0000000 Message Refused.  A URL
in the content of your message was found on...uribl.com.  For resolution
do not contact Cox Communications, contact the block list
administrators.)

This seems a rather unwise policy on behalf of cox.net -- their
customers 
can originate scam emails, but cox.net abuse desk apparently does not
care 
to hear about it.