North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: unwise filtering policy from

  • From: Martin Hannigan
  • Date: Tue Nov 20 16:39:03 2007
  • Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=kWlPjZ/DBgHais8oL1wYW3Zb1BXeN4uGQkQWbQCRuRo=; b=dOY38loJ1J51C48qBrb+S7+aiSFGTUAgjiMna81IxwIhEeoHMPT/kj+S6lT4rkPnIwM622BECFMADz2vqX/vlKMaWJTkNvwm/k20xAs8nZOeTz3Ye94z6spKAQMY0Z83tCN2APLxBoIo9NOfEjo/WSbCoasmI4QqV/Nt7/ojjsc=
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=S0qMJEOsM0hGVJIeRepgXC63g32Lmqbd0RuRlhdyhV1kD1GwOsuc/VfBlPiz/W5SJbjyoovwGnqRLVx+WYpV84byR6aJ6EuwZ8ShoqKbiihmWsc98qjqCcdrxwZfbh5MtitxAPhY4hVWKSSYbtzYARkWK93B1pTwjZ2H8COLGeI=

On Nov 20, 2007 2:21 PM,  <[email protected]> wrote:

[ snip ]

>     ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
> <[email protected]>
>      (reason: 552 5.2.0 F77u1Y00B2ccxfT0000000 Message Refused.  A URL in the content of your message was found  For resolution do not contact Cox Communications, contact the block list administrators.)
> This seems a rather unwise policy on behalf of -- their customers
> can originate scam emails, but abuse desk apparently does not care
> to hear about it.

I haven't had any issues between my network and cox related to mail
operations lately.

What URL?