North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Historical
Re: unwise filtering policy from cox.net
- From: Martin Hannigan
- Date: Tue Nov 20 16:39:03 2007
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=kWlPjZ/DBgHais8oL1wYW3Zb1BXeN4uGQkQWbQCRuRo=; b=dOY38loJ1J51C48qBrb+S7+aiSFGTUAgjiMna81IxwIhEeoHMPT/kj+S6lT4rkPnIwM622BECFMADz2vqX/vlKMaWJTkNvwm/k20xAs8nZOeTz3Ye94z6spKAQMY0Z83tCN2APLxBoIo9NOfEjo/WSbCoasmI4QqV/Nt7/ojjsc=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=S0qMJEOsM0hGVJIeRepgXC63g32Lmqbd0RuRlhdyhV1kD1GwOsuc/VfBlPiz/W5SJbjyoovwGnqRLVx+WYpV84byR6aJ6EuwZ8ShoqKbiihmWsc98qjqCcdrxwZfbh5MtitxAPhY4hVWKSSYbtzYARkWK93B1pTwjZ2H8COLGeI=
On Nov 20, 2007 2:21 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:
[ snip ]
> ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
> <[email protected]>
> (reason: 552 5.2.0 F77u1Y00B2ccxfT0000000 Message Refused. A URL in the content of your message was found on...uribl.com. For resolution do not contact Cox Communications, contact the block list administrators.)
>
> This seems a rather unwise policy on behalf of cox.net -- their customers
> can originate scam emails, but cox.net abuse desk apparently does not care
> to hear about it.
I haven't had any issues between my network and cox related to mail
operations lately.
What URL?
-M<
|