|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical RE: large-scale wireless [was: cpu needed to NAT 45mbs]
Aruba has some pretty large implementations under their belt including Microsoft Corp. Check them out. Tom -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Niels Bakker Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2007 12:35 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: large-scale wireless [was: cpu needed to NAT 45mbs] * [email protected] (Frank Bulk) [Tue 13 Nov 2007, 14:24 CET]: >If you're going with Extricom you don't need to worry about channel >planning beyond adding more "channel blankets". I understand Foundry's wireless products do the same thing. Seems to work ok but have not heard about larger test cases than a hundred or so clients. * [email protected] (Carl Karsten) [Tue 13 Nov 2007, 05:56 CET]: >On Wifi for 1000: [..] In the context of that, you may wish to peruse the proceedings of the last few CCC Congresses in Berlin, which had pretty much working wireless - even with thousands of attendees: http://events.ccc.de/camp/2007/Fahrplan/attachments/1347-Camp07-NetworkR eview.pdf http://events.ccc.de/congress/2006/Fahrplan/attachments/1247-23c3-noc-re view-corrected.pdf http://events.ccc.de/congress/2005/fahrplan/attachments/652-slides_netwo rk_review.pdf (They're still looking for a sponsor of wireless equipment for this year's edition, by the way) Regards, -- Niels. -- "The Mac doesn't have a one-button mouse, it has a five-button mouse, with four of the buttons on the keyboard." -- Peter da Silva <[email protected]>
|