North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical
RE: large-scale wireless [was: cpu needed to NAT 45mbs]
Elmar: Marketing and theory -- I haven't had a chance to test it myself. BTW, I'm not regurgitating Extricom's marketing rhetoric when I say you don't need to worry about channel planning -- their product is designed with that specifically in mind. The technical benefits and caveats of this single-channel architecture, and the possible concerns that a network planner might have around the requirement to have L1 connectivity from Extricom's APs to their switch, are better discussed in another forum. Frank -----Original Message----- From: Elmar K. Bins [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2007 7:46 AM To: Frank Bulk Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: large-scale wireless [was: cpu needed to NAT 45mbs] [email protected] (Frank Bulk) wrote: > If you're going with Extricom you don't need to worry about channel planning > beyond adding more "channel blankets". Is that based on marketing, theory (based on the whitepapers and patent descriptions) or practical experience? Elmar.