North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Re: Hey, SiteFinder is back, again...
- From: Eliot Lear
- Date: Sun Nov 04 16:29:12 2007
- Authentication-results: ams-dkim-1; [email protected]; dkim=pass (s ig from cisco.com/amsdkim1002 verified; );
- Dkim-signature: v=0.5; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=343; t=1194211636; x=1195075636; c=relaxed/simple; s=amsdkim1002; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; [email protected]; z=From:=20Eliot=20Lear=20<[email protected]> |Subject:=20Re=3A=20Hey,=20SiteFinder=20is=20back,=20again... |Sender:=20; bh=9I9Y6lZrQnl8zCKd4oE1EXTKZWBa8NtcxDma52s5564=; b=oys4woLTFCWJw3p8l8t9lJD2ubQQO87CcazFUk9iv2kYcR3c+1cvT8O+aKjp20Z3T6Dwe8hi qWf8G3JpMNzDRloTgoibNOmg39NshFRaFOuHLrdVOzrtNkx+w0BGKChW;
Sean Donelan wrote:
> I just wish the IETF would acknowledge this and go ahead and define a
> DNS bit for artificial DNS answers for all these "address correction"
> and "domain parking" and "domain tasting" people to use for their keen
> "Web 2.0" ideas.
Yes, it sounds like the evil bit. Why would anyone bother to set it?