North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: Can P2P applications learn to play fair on networks?
On 10/22/07 2:01 AM, "Mikael Abrahamsson" <[email protected]> wrote: > Could someone who knows DOCSIS 3.0 (perhaps these are general > DOCSIS questions) enlighten me (and others?) by responding to a few things > I have been thinking about. > > Let's say cable provider is worried about aggregate upstream capacity for > each HFC node that might have a few hundred users. Do the modems support > schemes such as "everybody is guaranteed 128 kilobit/s, if there is > anything to spare, people can use it but it's marked differently in IP > PRECEDENCE and treated accordingly to the HFC node", and then carry it > into the IP aggregation layer, where packets could also be treated > differently depending on IP PREC. > > This is in my mind a much better scheme (guarantee subscribers a certain > percentage of their total upstream capacity, mark their packets > differently if they burst above this), as this is general and not protocol > specific. It could of course also differentiate on packet sizes and a lot > of other factors. Bad part is that it gives the user an incentive to > "hack" their CPE to allow them to send higher speed with high priority > traffic, thus hurting their neighbors. Yes, as a part of the DOCSIS specification (waiting for D3.0 not required); however, implementations vary on the CMTS end of the equation though. Having this capability ubiquitously on the CMTS equipment simplifies the problem space greatly (plus removes that hacked CPE risk). -ron
|