North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical
> Joe, > On Oct 18, 2007, at 8:49 AM, Joe Greco wrote: > > The ROI on the move to v6 is immense compared to the ROI on the move > > to v4-240+, which will surely only benefit a few. > > I am told by people who have inside knowledge that one of the issues > they are facing in deploying IPv6 is that an IPv6 stack + IPv4 stack > have a larger memory footprint that IPv4 alone in devices that have > essentially zero memory for code left (in fact, they're designed that > way). Fixing devices so that they can accept 240/4 is a software fix > that can be done with a binary patch and no additional memory. And > there are a _lot_ of these devices. Sure, I agree there are. How does that number compare to the number of devices which can't or won't be upgraded to IPv4-240+? ... JG -- Joe Greco - sol.net Network Services - Milwaukee, WI - http://www.sol.net "We call it the 'one bite at the apple' rule. Give me one chance [and] then I won't contact you again." - Direct Marketing Ass'n position on e-mail spam(CNN) With 24 million small businesses in the US alone, that's way too many apples.