North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Historical
Re: IPv6 routes, was: How Not to Multihome
- From: William Herrin
- Date: Mon Oct 08 21:34:25 2007
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; bh=ybn2bXsWhQNV51RuGqDur7NXTbjXY48TyQ2eLf0uW/Y=; b=WWSMQaLQkdiSPkoy6BbvsCYk9Kt4kpQ9bL2fbV3nbqGvtgH1bkmZjI1OwPyrlpsWD4q4GPn1KTl0JQx2OMjeLI4Ce0jV5AdyIfxNDixPLvpMbPp/zwS+912ycSyhzJ/SLD2iQUVPU9WCoFvzm4+/uWRv2V1AlIQEB+WISeBNRxs=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=EZ2p2xCik2WCEkkYKSnligsPoTl0W6F6cNiVr0LFGniNEwG2vnNV2eBfk4Q5uLLGrBMr9+f1IUySWPxMoZMO2rQq/q7MkpW2x+qWzqWxL474Sg0HfWRSffgnWYpAoqgmfTRT+HYg8Ymnq2b3Cmsi/Knj0vuP050AXyd9ow8zmq0=
On 10/8/07, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:
> Wouldn't resources still be an issue. Since the address space is so much
> larger wouldn't the 235k v6 routes take up more than 4 times the router
> memory?
Keegan,
According to Cisco's product feature pages IPv6 routes take up twice
as much space in the TCAM as IPv4 routes. Make of that what you will.
Regards,
Bill Herrin
--
William D. Herrin [email protected] [email protected]
3005 Crane Dr. Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/>
Falls Church, VA 22042-3004
|