Re: Access to the IPv4 net for IPv6-only systems, was: Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6)

• From: Valdis . Kletnieks
• Date: Fri Oct 05 14:12:40 2007

On Fri, 05 Oct 2007 18:56:48 +0200, Mohacsi Janos said:

> controller can force enable/disable. I don't see how RIAA can lobby for 
> switching off privacy enhancement - disabling certain component of the 
> operating system?.

Consider the fact that they lobbied *and got* 17 USC 512 takedowns, and
the DMCA anti-circumvention clause.

Still don't see how they could lobby for it?

Attachment: pgp00004.pgp
Description: PGP signature

• References:
  • Re: Access to the IPv4 net for IPv6-only systems, was: Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6) Stephen Sprunk
  • Re: Access to the IPv4 net for IPv6-only systems, was: Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6) Iljitsch van Beijnum
  • Re: Access to the IPv4 net for IPv6-only systems, was: Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6) Stephen Sprunk
  • Re: Access to the IPv4 net for IPv6-only systems, was: Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6) Iljitsch van Beijnum
  • Re: Access to the IPv4 net for IPv6-only systems, was: Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6) Stephen Sprunk
  • Re: Access to the IPv4 net for IPv6-only systems, was: Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6) Iljitsch van Beijnum
  • Re: Access to the IPv4 net for IPv6-only systems, was: Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6) Valdis . Kletnieks
  • Re: Access to the IPv4 net for IPv6-only systems, was: Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6) Valdis . Kletnieks

• Prev by Date: Weekly Routing Table Report
• Next by Date: Re: Why do some ISP's have bandwidth quotas?
• Date Index
• Thread Index
• Author Index
• Historical