North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: Access to the IPv4 net for IPv6-only systems, was: Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6)

  • From: Eliot Lear
  • Date: Thu Oct 04 07:39:56 2007
  • Authentication-results: ams-dkim-2; [email protected]; dkim=pass (s ig from cisco.com/amsdkim2001 verified; );
  • Dkim-signature: v=0.5; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=365; t=1191497829; x=1192361829; c=relaxed/simple; s=amsdkim2001; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; [email protected]; z=From:=20Eliot=20Lear=20<[email protected]> |Subject:=20Re=3A=20Access=20to=20the=20IPv4=20net=20for=20IPv6-only=20sy stems,=20was=3A=20Re=3A=20WG=20Action=3A=0A=20Conclusion=20of=20IP=20Versi on=206=20(ipv6) |Sender:=20; bh=uGVnvFNelfDlx+UXfw3u4too1sXHzpnPTw9fTQLtmIc=; b=ukEM3mBtgs5iagL1M0ZH5JHVlgNbnlhghzHgVv/WUa1ozPc7nwjHWMrh+7UJ8HGJKiQ8VwW4 22Pa7FrCVyyH0QVnRrMWPXvFG9eFJM6Ib9SadLhDMKpIsR9iPZ2eYydZ;
Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
>> That isn't actually true.  I could move to IPv6 and deploy a NAT-PT
>> box to give my customers access to the v4 Internet regardless of
>> whatever the rest of the community thinks.
>
> And then you'll see your active FTP sessions, SIP calls, RTSP
> sessions, etc fail.

Somehow we made it work for v4.  How did that happen?