North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6)
>> o nat-pt with standardized algs for at least dns, smtp, http, sip, >> and rtp -->> This is on my top 3 hot topics. And make it works both >> way, v4 to v6 and v6 to v4. And also don’t call it NAT-PT. That >> name is dead. > For what it is worth, this is one of the things that I want to do. i took you at your word the other month, so stopped worrying about motivating it. as far as getting it through the ivtf, well, that ain't my job any more. i gave at the office. thank you for accepting the burden. > I don't want to give you an impression that NAT-PT++ will solve all > the IPv6 transition issues heck no. but it will enable folk to have v6-almost-only (except for one ipv4 address) sites in a dual stack and mostly v4 world. it will allow end site transition. randy
|